Tech and policy, seen from inside
Short posts do well on LinkedIn. Long-form doesn't, and it isn't really mine: it doesn't rank, it can't be exported, and it lives or dies with the platform. So this is the add-on – a plain blog, which becomes the asset, while LinkedIn is the distribution.
What goes here: whatever I am interested in. Right now that's AI, different LLM deployments, the policy around it, and its diffusion in the enterprise.
I research and fact-check these notes with Claude and ChatGPT, and I check every claim against the primary source before it goes in. The judgements, and the mistakes, are mine.
If you're interested, you can check out the AI Strategic Autonomy Framework.
Latest
Can Europe support more frontier AI laboratories?
Europe can supply most of what a frontier AI laboratory needs. Chips and, above all, customers are the hard gaps. The first of two notes.
Who decides whether Europe's AI keeps running?
China's draft export rules and Washington's June cut-off of two Claude models show that Europe's best AI depends on decisions taken in other capitals.
The sensitive tier: what AI capacity Europe must control, and what it means for Bulgaria
Europe's most sensitive public-sector AI needs hundreds of GPUs, not gigawatt factories. Bulgaria already has most of what it takes to control it.
The skill behind the slop
Shopify and Microsoft executives say AI is producing unchecked, empty work. The missing step is human: reading, checking, and owning the result.
The White House accord, measured against the eight elements
The frontier labs and the US President signed a commitment on containing AI agents. It stops at the company boundary – the half of the rule Europe could write.